I mean, how can you equate a Ping Pong great to say a Boxing great? Currently the spotlight, adulation or grade of a certain 'great' is largely based on the popularity of the freaking sport.
Like Jordan is held in higher esteem than say a Cycling great even though the latter may have overcome far higher degree of difficulty specific and UNspecific to his individual sport.
Who outside the US has even heard of ANY NFL great? Heck, even some obvious NBA greats are virtually unknown 'outside', like say Shaq or even Kobe.
Shouldn't the work needed to reach 'great' status dictated largely by the demands of a certain sport alongwith the severity of obstacles one had to jump through - related or unrelated to the sport - be the SOLE determiner?
Shouldn't there be a body of current and former players who should be entrusted to assign a certain number to EVERY 'great' 'bestownation' thereby allowing the 'true' warrior to get recognised independent of the popularity of the sport - within and outside the country of choice?
Factors like depth in competition, technology, stronger players etc. should be taken into account to arrive at a station that can reduce the generational disparity to the minimum thereby allowing fans to appreciate a 'TRUE' talent rather than a one produced by the media.
Recent Comments