Posted at 05:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (4)
Could it be this:
The endowed talent was so sufficient to so ridiculously dominate the landscape that the need to button up the jacket - to the last button - was rendered an overkill?
For rock people, there hasn't been a basketball player (Center?) as dominant as Shaq - EVER. In his prime, once the ball reached his hands it was considered an automatic basket - regardless of anything. Nobody could stop him except...........what he left unbuttoned - due to laziness.
Federer in his prime matched that standard. Nobody could stop him except.........what he left unbuttoned - due to laziness.
Will leave the rest of the post to appear tomorrow to give you freaking freaks a chance to figure out what I am barking about.
IF you can figure it out, you will qualify for not just the Wall Of Fame listing but also an email from me confirming you as one of the (you cannot pass me of course) most knowledgeable tennis fans on the planet.
Only once has the email happened in the past. Rock won it.
Even though it should have been just the 'What's common between Shaq and Federer', there was no freaking way you cheap freaking freaks would have guessed it, so the hint above.
Correct answer / Winner: Friday, May 24, 2013.
-----------------------------------------
Rest of the post:
If historically, certain weak links have been exposed beyond obviously, not addressing them while building your career would - to put it mildly - be tantamount to being lazy, don't you think?
We ALL are inherently lazy. It's just the matter of how bad is the 'nail' hurting (Dog is sitting on a nail and groaning with pain but won't move until the pain is unbearable).
Shaq knew that the station he was aiming for can be reached without the added effort and energy needed to fix the historical problem (Read: Nail not hurting bad enough). He though he could be counted amongst the greats of the game without the 'fix'. And he was right. You think Shaq would have acted differently if he wanted to be the stand alone GOAT of NBA? You bet!!!!! Heard of Jordan ignoring even the slightest problem forget the one being broadcast through the ages?
Similarly, single-handed backhand has been proven historically to be the weakest link. So why didn't Federer fix it? Federer was able to win a vast majority of his matches without perfecting a perfectly unnatural shot.
Forget Nadal and on clay, do you think that Federer's losses to other players and on any surface was LARGELY the product of the opponent succeeding in exploiting his backhand beyond an average standard? You bet!!!! It certainly wasn't because of his forehand, don't you think? That small a number of losses was not pain enough to move away from the nail.
Federer knew of the weakness LONNNNNG before Nadal came along to make him pay for his laziness. IF Federer wanted to be the stand alone GOAT badly and felt the pain even at those few losses, he would have switched to recognize the altered landscape - technology, bigger / stronger players, nutrition etc. - demanding it as BASIC requirement. Federer believed he could get to the station without that added cost and hassle because of superior talent - and he has. It's just that there was another notch well within grasp and so beyond ANYONE else EVER that could have been scaled if not for 'laziness' - also called the 'nail'.
------------------------------------
WINNER: CHIPNPUTT
Posted at 04:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)
| Round | Djokovic | Federer | Nadal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Goffin | Qualifier | Brands | ||||
| 2nd | Dodig | Qualifier | Klizan | ||||
| 3rd | Dimitrov | Benneteau | Fognini | ||||
| 4th | Kholschreiber | Simon | Nishikori | ||||
| Quarter | Tipsy | Tsonga | Gasquet | ||||
| Semi | Nadal | Ferrer / Berdych | Djokovic | ||||
| Final | Federer | Nadal / Djokovic | Federer |
|
Posted at 02:42 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Posted at 02:32 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)



Posted at 07:33 PM in Slightly funny photos. | Permalink | Comments (17)



Posted at 07:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Larry Bird.
Jordan.
Kobe.
Nadal.
Lendl.
Connors.
Tyson.
You got more? No, you don't!!!!!!!!!
Posted at 07:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 07:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
That's after squashing the possibility that Nadal faces Djokovic before the final. If the officials decided to not alter Nadal's seed bracket, manipulating the draw to ensure Nadal stays away from Djokovic's half will sufficiently cover up for the craziness.
So with that as the caveat, here's what may hold Djokovic back from facing a near-certain prospect of duelling Nadal in the final:
-Two back to back losses at TWO tune up events (Madrid and Rome)? It wasn't that he reached the final and lost. One was in the opening freaking round to Mr. Sharapova, other in quarters to Berdych. Just losses in the finals should be enough to maul your conviction psychologically but to not even get there?
Add the fact that you have won BOTH tournaments in the past (2011) - over Nadal. AND you still lost to Nadal @ Roland Garros. How do you think are your chances without the tune up wins?
All that without even inserting the devastating form Nadal is currently appears to be flaunting. Nadal lost BOTH tune ups to you and won Roland Garros - over you. He has won both this time. Any freaking questions? The blow mentally is enough to 'force' you to subconsciously bow with respect - early.
-Ankle: Is it safe to assume that the ankle injury may have directly or indirectly impacted Djokovic's form sufficiently enough to 'allow' two early exits - specially the one right after (Dimitrov)? And when viewing everything in totality could only compound the problem? It's possible.
-Given all of above, wouldn't focusing on Wimbledon appear far more rationale rather than banging against an immovable object to further damage the psyche - and the body?
It's hard to run a race when the winner - reasonably, justifiably and unanimously - has already been anointed. You are then just running on a treadmill going nowhere - fast - while adversely influencing what appears far within your abilities.
The entire above package cannot escape Djokovic's subconscious mind regardless of how much he wills himself consciously to 'complete' the journey thereby opening himself up for a realistic early exit possibility while providing an even greater motivation to win @ Wimbledon - by way of theory of compensation.
Posted at 05:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Posted at 03:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (9)
That no matter how dignified and 'evolved' the facade may seem, the 'word' is just a few inches (millimeters?) away - waiting for the right button to be pushed.
Everyone 'HAS' a word and regardless of how 2013 the crowd you interact with is, it's just a matter of ruffling the 'right' feather to unleash 'your' word - publicly.
You think Garcia just spontaneously came up with the 'word'? Get freaking real. He had been running that in his head ever since they first brushed against each other years ago. It's just that the right feather wasn't reached then, that's all.
Oh, what did you say? "I would never 'use' the word". Sure.
Posted at 03:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (11)
Posted at 02:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Europe's largest economy Germany, which has been criticized for not doing enough to help struggling euro zone countries, has topped a poll as the world's most popular country.
The survey carried out for the BBC, polled 26,000 people in 25 countries, and asked them to rate 16 countries and the European Union, as a whole, on whether their influence on the world was mainly positive or negative.
Germany came out on top, with 59 percent of the survey's participants awarding it a positive rating. The country moved up three percentage points from its 2012 position. It displaced Japan at the top of the table, which saw its positive rating fall from 58 percent last year to 51 percent, falling from first to fourth place.
The most negatively perceived country was Iran, with only 15 percent of respondents giving it a positive rating. Pakistan and North Korea also received low ratings.
Germany's increased popularity was helped by positive reviews from people in Spain, France, Ghana and Australia. But in debt-laden Greece a majority of people polled gave Germany negative ratings.
The German government's policy of tackling over indebtedness through harsh austerity measures has proven unpopular in peripheral euro zone economies.
Alastair Newton, political analyst at Japanese investment bank Nomura, said Germany's popularity in the survey is not surprising given the alternative choices.
"There are lots of reasons why Germany is admired. It is a large and important world economy, a world-class manufacturer and has a Chancellor who demonstrates genuine leadership," said Newton. "The question also is where else would it be? It is hardly likely to be the U.S., given their attitude to the Middle East, or China given Western and Japanese concerns on the country," he added.
The United States ranked eighth on the list, with 45 percent of respondents saying its influence is mainly positive. China ranked ninth, at 42 percent.
But Jennifer McKeown, European economist at research house Capital Economics, said the results of this survey were likely to be different if it was euro zone focused rather than global.
"The big difference here is that this is a worldwide survey, rather than a euro zone focused one. I'm not sure how relevant this is as it is the perception of Germany within the euro zone that is more important."
"Negative sentiment towards Germany in the peripheral economies is a worry, as in countries like Italy we are seeing people swaying towards parties with less focus on fiscal tightening and more on growth orientated policies," she said. "This is damaging for Germany's proposed vision of the euro zone where it gets more of a say in how things are run," McKeown added.
Other countries which also saw a boost to their popularity ratings included the U.K., which climbed to third place in the table, following its hosting of the 2012 Olympics.
China and India proved less popular however, after improving for a number of years, their ratings fell sharply in 2013. China sank to ninth position, with 42 percent of the respondents giving it a positive rating. India was ranked 12th, with 35 percent of those polled saying their perception of the country was negative, while 34 percent viewed it positively.
Views on the European Union's influence on the rest of the world improved slightly in 2013, after it dropped to its lowest level last year. In 2013, the EU's rating rose one percentage point to 49 percent. However, the perception of the EU did deteriorate markedly in certain countries, including Germany itself, Canada and the U.S. In the U.K. for the first time this year, more Britons rated the EU negatively (47 percent) than positively (42 percent).
The survey was conducted for the BBC by international opinion research consultancy GlobeScan and Washington-based Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), through face to face and telephone interviews with randomly selected people.
The survey has been carried out since 2005 and the current survey was conducted from January to March 2013.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-popular-country-world-revealed-124454759.htmlPosted at 02:17 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
CHIPNPUTT
Posted at 07:14 PM in Slightly funny photos. | Permalink | Comments (6)
-Record 8th Slam @ one Major.
-Strong Calendar Slam possibility.
-Reclaiming of the year-end No. 1 rank.
-Channel Slam.
-Career Slam.
-No. 18 - over Nadal? Sure, why not!!!!!
-Renaming of event as 'Nadalownsitdon'tevendreamaboutitgarrosOpenClosed'?
Posted at 04:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
JENNY
Win/Loss clay results year to date.
1. Djokovic 8/2
2. *Murray 3/3
3. Federer 5/2
4. Nadal 31/2
5. Ferrer 15/5
6. Berdych 8/4
7. *Del Potro 2/2
8. Tsonga 7/3
9. Gasquet 4/3
10.Tipsarevic 2/4
* Withdrawn from FO
Source ATP
Posted at 04:42 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
1. He has been playing non stop since the beginning of February.
2. ALL except one of the eight tournaments were on clay - unanimously acknowledged to be the the most punishing surface - physically.
3. He reached ALL eight finals, implying minimal time to rest for the next one. He has NEVER gone on this gruelling a run in his entire career - both with respect to straight finals and the number of clay tournaments.
4. Next outing sports the five set format most likely to expose the toll on the knees already exacted.
5. To add to the grind was one hard court Masters 1000 event squeezed in to leave nothing to chance.
6. Original cause of the problem not only STILL persists it has been (should be?) severely aggravated by all of above.
Posted at 03:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (4)
Sunday, May 26
5:00 am - 10:00 am: First round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: First round (Tennis Channel, Live)
12:00 pm - 3:00 pm: First round (NBC, Live)
Monday, May 27
5:00 am - 10:00 am: First round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: First round (Tennis Channel, Live)
12:00 pm - 3:00 pm: First round (NBC, Live)
Tuesday, May 28
5:00 am - 10:00 am: First round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: First round (Tennis Channel, Live)
Wednesday, May 29
5:00 am - 10:00 am: Second round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: Second round (Tennis Channel, Live)
Thursday, May 30
5:00 am - 10:00 am: Second round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: Second round (Tennis Channel, Live)
Friday, May 31
5:00 am - 10:00 am: Third round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: Third round (Tennis Channel, Live)
Saturday, June 1
5:00 am - 12:00 pm: Third round (Tennis Channel, Live)
12:00 pm - 3:00 pm: Third round (NBC, Live)
Sunday, June 2
5:00 am - 1:00 pm: Fourth round (Tennis Channel, Live)
1:00 pm - 4:00 pm: Fourth round (NBC, Live)
Monday, June 3
5:00 am - 10:00 am: Fourth round (ESPN2, Live)
10:00 am - 7:00 pm: Fourth round (Tennis Channel, Live)
Tuesday, June 4
8:00 am - 1:00 pm: Quarterfinals (Tennis Channel, Live)
1:00 pm - 7:00 pm: Quarterfinals (ESPN2, Live)
Wednesday, June 5
8:00 am - 1:00 pm: Quarterfinals (ESPN2, Live)
1:00 pm - 7:00 pm: Quarterfinals (Tennis Channel, Live)
Thursday, June 6
6:00 am - 9:00 am: Mixed Doubles Final (Tennis Channel, Live)
9:00 am - 2:00 pm: Women's Semifinals (ESPN2, Live)
11:00 am - 2:00 pm: Women's Semifinals (NBC, Live)
2:00 pm - 7:00 pm: Women's Semifinals (Tennis Channel, Repeat)
Friday, June 7
7:00 am - 11:00 am: Men's Semifinals (Tennis Channel, Live)
11:00 am - 2:00 pm: Men's Semifinals (NBC, Live)
5:00 pm - 12:00 pm: Men's Semifinals (Tennis Channel, Repeat)
Saturday, June 8
12:00 am - 7:00 am: Men's Semifinals (Tennis Channel, Repeat)
9:00 am - 12:00 pm: Women's Final (NBC, Live)
Sunday, June 9
9:00 am - 2:00 pm: Men's Final (NBC, Live)
2:00 pm - 2:00 am: Men's & Women's Finals (Tennis Channel, Repeat)
Posted at 02:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
The relief: Go outside between 2 and 3 p.m.
Why it works: Pollen takes a siesta in the afternoon, says Haig Tcheurekdjian, M.D., associate clinical professor at Case Western Reserve University. “Pollen is released from grass in the morning, and as the day heats up, it rises high enough into the air where you won’t have any contact with it,” he says.
The relief: A run. After allergy sufferers ran for 30 minutes, their symptoms all decreased by more than 70 percent, according to new research from Thailand.
Why it works: Cardio exercise may calm inflammatory proteins in the nasal passages, researchers say.
The relief: Make the most of rainy days.
Why it works: Right after it rains, pollen is cleared from the air, so it’s a good time to be outside, says Dr. Tcheurekdjian.
The relief: Turn on the A.C.
Why it works: A window air conditioning unit works like an air filter, decreasing the amount of pollen indoors, says Dr. Tcheurekdjian. Crank it up if you’re working out indoors or for a few minutes every day to clear the air.
The relief: Wash your sheets once a week at 140 degrees Fahrenheit.
Why it works: If dust mites have you sneezing and sniffling, know their weakness: heat. Washing your bed sheets in hot water will kill them.
The relief: Freeze your favorite pillow.
Why it works: Since you’re probably not going to throw a pillow in the washer and dryer—freeze it, says Dr. Jonathan Horbal, D.O., fellow of allergy immunology at University Hospitals in Cleveland. A 12-hour dip in the freezer every 1 to 2 weeks kills the mites—and doing it regularly keeps them from coming back, he adds.
The relief: Cut down on dairy for a few days.
Why it works: It’s been suggested that up to 70 percent of people can’t tolerate dairy because they’re missing the enzyme lactase, says Steven Lamm, M.D., author of No Guts, No Glory. When you have a hard time with dairy, your immune system can go into overdrive, responding worse to relatively innocuous things like pollen.
The relief: Hop in a hot shower.
Why it works: Humid, moist air will reach your sinuses and slowly clear your nose, offering relief, says William Schaffner, M.D., infectious disease specialist and chair of the department of preventative medicine at Vanderbilt University.
The relief: Ditch old books for an iPad.
Why it works: If mold has you sneezing and sniffling, old books could be to blame, says Dr. Horbal. Keep them out of your bedroom to save your sleep.
The relief: Breathe through your nose, not your mouth.
Why it works: Your nose filters incoming air, helping keep allergens out.
http://health.yahoo.net/experts/menshealth/10-med-free-ways-beat-allergies
Posted at 01:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (4)
Some 3-D printer food made from meal worms (TNO research)
Call it food for thought. Or perhaps thought for food: NASA has given a six-month grant to a company developing what could be the world’s first 3-D food printer. And the project’s developer, reports Quartz, an online digital news site, believes the invention could be used to end world hunger.
Quartz explains that the printer is the brainchild of mechanical engineer Anjan Contractor. Being developed by Contractor’s company, Systems & Materials Research Corp., it will use proteins, carbohydrates and sugars to create edible food products.
Contractor says one of his primary motivations is a belief that food will become exponentially more expensive in the near future. The average consumer, he told Quartz, will need a more economically viable option.
Some alternative food source options that may be used with the printer include algae, duckweed, grass, lupine seeds, beet leaves and even insects, according to TNO Research, which is working with Contractor on the project.
“I think, and many economists think, that current food systems can’t supply 12 billion people sufficiently,” said Contractor. “So we eventually have to change our perception of what we see as food.”
One of Contractor’s first prototypes will be a 3-D pizza printer, and he hopes to begin building it over the next couple of weeks. Contractor, reports Quartz, explained that it will print "a layer of dough, which is baked at the same time it’s printed, by a heated plate at the bottom of the printer. Then it lays down a tomato base, 'which is also stored in a powdered form, and then mixed with water and oil.'" Lastly comes the "protein layer."
Contractor also hopes that people will be able to share recipes via an open source coding system.
“One of the major advantages of a 3-D printer is that it provides personalized nutrition,” Contractor told Quartz. “If you’re male, female, someone is sick—they all have different dietary needs. If you can program your needs into a 3-D printer, it can print exactly the nutrients that person requires.”
NASA is certainly a believer: The six-month grant comes to $125,000. The agency specifically interested in using the 3-D printer to feed astronauts on long space voyages.
“Long distance space travel requires 15-plus years of shelf life,” Contractor said to Quartz. “The way we are working on it is, all the carbs, proteins and macro and micro nutrients are in powder form. We take moisture out, and in that form it will last maybe 30 years.”
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/nasa-awards-grant-3d-food-printer-could-end-194050661.html
Posted at 01:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 01:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted at 07:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Recent Comments